Trump Backtracker

 

Climate Advisers conducted an analysis of all of the Obama-era climate policies on the books and in the pipeline at the end of that administration – and plans to regularly update how vulnerable they are to backtracking by the Trump administration, and what that means for U.S. climate pollution trajectory.

APRIL 2017 UPDATE

Our first update to the Backtracker looks at where things stand near the end of President Trump’s first 100 days in office. We found that the “Trump Effect” really begins to bite into the U.S. emissions trajectory in 2025 – since many of the factors influencing today’s emissions trajectory can’t be reversed quickly.

We found:

  • The Trump Effect could mean more than half a gigaton more climate pollution in 2025. That’s about the same as the emissions from electricity use for 60% of the homes in the entire country.

  • Of the Obama 2015 climate goals, a whopping 332 million metric tons (mmt) of climate pollution cuts in 2025 – or 55%– currently come from policies that we judge highly vulnerable.

  • 229 million tons, or 38%, come from moderately vulnerable policies. And just 7% of potential emissions cuts, or 45 mmt, are relatively safe and just rated “vulnerable.”

Policy Vulnerability by
Pollution Reduction Potential

Overview
Overview
Obama-era policies that are highly vulnerable, moderately vulnerable or vulnerable to rollback by the Trump administration could cut climate pollution by 605 million metric tons in 2025.
Overview
Highly Vulnerable Policies
Highly Vulnerable Policies
Responsible for cutting 332 million metric tons of climate pollution in 2025 -- 55% of all reductions at risk.
Highly Vulnerable Policies
Moderately Vulnerable Policies
Moderately Vulnerable Policies
Responsible for cutting 229 million metric tons of climate pollution in 2025 -- 38% of all reductions at risk.
Moderately Vulnerable Policies
Vulnerable Policies
Vulnerable Policies
Responsible for cutting 45 million metric tons of climate pollution in 2025 -- 7% of all reductions at risk.
Vulnerable Policies

Read our full findings here >